首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparisons between Modal-Parameter-Based and Flexibility-Based Damage Identification Methods
【2h】

Comparisons between Modal-Parameter-Based and Flexibility-Based Damage Identification Methods

机译:基于模态参数和基于柔韧性的损伤识别方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Modal parameters and modal flexibility obtained from the modal experiment have been used for damage identification in frequency domain. These two methods are compared in this paper numerically and experimentally. The optimization objective function of the former method is a weighted function of the frequency and mode shape residues, in which different weights can be assigned to the frequencies and mode shapes so that their degrees of accuracy can be taken into account. The optimization objective function of the latter method is the modal flexibility residue. Based on the same modal data, the two methods are compared from different aspects, including the damage configurations and uncertainties in the modal data. Results show that using the modal parameters directly can detect damage more accurately and reliably than using the modal flexibility.
机译:从模态实验获得的模态参数和模态柔韧性已用于频域损伤识别。本文对这两种方法进行了数值和实验比较。前一种方法的优化目标函数是频率和模式形状残差的加权函数,其中可以将不同的权重分配给频率和模式形状,从而可以考虑其准确性。后一种方法的优化目标函数是模态柔性残差。基于相同的模态数据,从不同方面比较了这两种方法,包括模态数据中的损伤配置和不确定性。结果表明,与使用模态灵活性相比,直接使用模态参数可以更准确,更可靠地检测损坏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号